ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in Europe: challenges and lessons from global practice.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and a public health concern, with 75% of cases considered preventable. Biannual liver ultrasound, with or without serum alpha-fetoprotein, is recommended as surveillance for patients at high risk of HCC. While the rationale for surveillance is strong and it continues to be recommended by all professional societies, there is ongoing debate about the strength and relevance of the evidence supporting surveillance for all populations with cirrhosis. European surveillance uptake is suboptimal, with high rates of late-stage diagnosis and subsequent poor prognosis. In this paper, we provide an overview of surveillance focusing on Europe and draw lessons from across the world. We discuss lessons learnt from the implementation of national and coordinated surveillance programmes in Asian countries and the global challenges resulting from the changing epidemiology of chronic liver disease, particularly the rise of MASLD. We consider the patient perspective, including stigma and inequalities in access and delivery. We explore emerging approaches to surveillance, including biomarkers, abbreviated MRI and risk-stratification, which may improve early diagnosis. Finally, we address the lack of funding and political willpower arising from an insufficient evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.