ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
HPV positivity despite cytological negativity: Risk assessment with colposcopic and histopathological findings.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate agreement between colposcopy-directed histopathological findings and final histopathological diagnoses in women with negative cytology but positive high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV), and to assess associations of HPV genotypes with concordance and recurrence. Methodology: This retrospective study included women aged ≥18 years with negative cytology and HR-HPV positivity who underwent colposcopy at a tertiary center between January 2020 and January 2025. Histopathological results were obtained from endocervical curettage (ECC), biopsy, or conization. Concordance was defined as agreement between colposcopy-directed histopathological findings and the final histopathological diagnosis. Patients were followed for at least 12 months, with recurrence defined as histopathological detection of LSIL/HSIL or re-detection of HR-HPV during follow-up. Results: A total of 222 women were included (median age: 44 years). Overall concordance was 53.2%. HPV16-positive women had lower concordance than HPV16-negative women (46.7% vs. 60.8%, p=0.036). HPV18, single-type, and multiple-type HR-HPV were not associated with concordance (all p>0.05). Recurrence occurred in 24.0% of patients with available follow-up data (n=125), with no significant association with HPV genotype. Conclusion: Colposcopy-directed histopathological assessment shows moderate agreement with final histopathology in cytology-negative, HR-HPV-positive women. HPV16 positivity may be associated with lower concordance, while HPV genotype was not associated with recurrence. Careful follow-up may be warranted, and larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.