Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819644›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2026

How a 10-minute bout requirement for physical activity affects guideline adherence estimates, Germany.

Julian Brummer, Michael J Stein, Hansjörg Baurecht, Mirko Brandes, Christoph Buck, Antje Hebestreit, Lilian Krist, Michael Leitzmann, Andrea Weber, Volker Harth and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Julian BrummerDivision of Physical Activity, Cancer Prevention and Survivorship, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Michael J SteinDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Hansjörg BaurechtDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Mirko BrandesLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany.
Christoph BuckLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany.
Antje HebestreitLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany.
Lilian KristInstitute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael LeitzmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Andrea WeberDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Volker HarthInstitute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jana-Kristin HeiseDepartment of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Verena KatzkeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas KeilInstitute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander KluttigInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics, and Informatics, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Claudia Meinke-FranzeInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Rafael MikolajczykInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics, and Informatics, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Ute MonsDivision of Primary Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina NimptschMolecular Epidemiology Research Group, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.
Nadia ObiInstitute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Cara ÖvermöhleInstitute of Epidemiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Annette PetersInstitute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Tobias PischonMolecular Epidemiology Research Group, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.
Börge SchmidtInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Matthias B SchulzeDepartment of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany.
Henry VölzkeInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Stefan N WillichInstitute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Florian HerbolsheimerDivision of Physical Activity, Cancer Prevention and Survivorship, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Karen SteindorfDivision of Physical Activity, Cancer Prevention and Survivorship, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine how adherence to the World Health Organization's (WHO) physical activity guidelines changes with and without the application of a 10-minute bout requirement. Methods: We analysed accelerometry data from the baseline assessment of the German National Cohort, NAKO. Using predefined acceleration thresholds, we classified each participant's volumes of moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity and compared these values with WHO guidelines. We analysed data with and without the 10-minute bout requirement. We used Welch's analysis of variance and equal proportions tests to compare demographic and health characteristics between participants who met the activity guidelines and those who did not. Findings: Of 63 134 participants, 22 226 (35.2%) met the guidelines with the bout requirement, while 62 532 (99.0%) met the guidelines without it. Participants who met the guidelines under each condition differed in demographic and health-related characteristics. For example, mean age was 48.6 years (SD: 13.0) among participants meeting the guidelines with the bout, 50.8 years (SD: 12.2) among those meeting only the guidelines without the bout and 60.8 years (SD: 10.4) among those meeting neither guidelines. Participants meeting the guidelines with the bout had a lower body mass index (25.2 kg/m Conclusion: Removing the 10-minute bout requirement for accelerometry-measured activity volumes substantially increased estimated guideline adherence. The change has implications for interpreting time trends in guideline adherence and alters conclusions about which population subgroups meet the guidelines.

Indexed as

ExerciseGuideline AdherenceAccelerometryAdultFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID42819644
PMCPMC13626531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.