ArticleSSM. Mental health2025
Adaptation of a PTSD intervention for use in primary care in a low-income country: The Brief Relaxation, Education And Trauma HEaling intervention for Ethiopia (BREATHE Ethiopia).
Article in SSM. Mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms amongst people with serious mental illness (SMI) are prevalent in Ethiopia and throughout the world, yet treatment is scarce, particularly in low-resource settings with few mental health providers. This study describes the process of adapting a PTSD treatment, originally designed to be delivered by mental health providers in specialty mental health clinics in the US, to be appropriate, acceptable and sustainable when delivered by non-specialist providers in routine care in rural Ethiopian primary care clinics. Methods included a literature review, qualitative interviews (N=48), an adaptation workshop (N=12), and theater, cognitive, and usability testing (N=14) with people with SMI, caregivers of people with SMI, health care providers, and community leaders. Participants found the intervention to be appropriate and acceptable, while also noting multiple patient, family, provider, clinic and community-level barriers that might impact successful delivery and receipt of the intervention. The intervention was adapted to address as many barriers as possible, while maintaining adherence to the original intervention's theoretical and conceptual model. While many of these barriers could be addressed with adaptations, others such as high rates of poverty and limited population-level mental health awareness, require policy and community-based solutions and systemic change. Future research is needed to assess whether the intervention is feasible and effective in this setting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.