ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026
Anatomical patterns and clinical outcomes of central venous catheter malpositions: A systematic review of published case reports and case series.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Central venous catheter (CVC) malpositions remain an underdiscussed complication despite their widespread recognition. This systematic review includes the published case reports to identify anatomical patterns of malposition, associated risk factors, detection strategies, and preventable causes of harm. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted for all the relevant articles from inception and published till December 2025. Two reviewers independently extracted data on demographics, catheter type, insertion site, mechanism of malposition, methods of detection, complications during procedure, and patient outcomes. Results: Sixty-six articles including 75 cases across 20 countries were included. The patient's age ranged from 19 to 90 years. The left internal jugular vein was most frequently associated with severe malpositions, including the perforation of the left brachiocephalic vein, mediastinal haematoma, and aberrant cannulation of the left internal mammary, accessory hemizygous and peri-cardio-phrenic veins. Malpositions occurred despite ultrasound guidance in many of the cases. Anatomical variants such as persistent left superior vena cava, anomalous pulmonary venous connections, and right-sided aortic arch were implicated but were often unrecognised. Chest radiograph was the primary detection method but was found insufficient in many cases, requiring computed tomography or trans-oesophageal echocardiography. There were six deaths which were directly attributed to malposition and predominantly occurred from delayed recognition of the complication. Conclusion: To conclude, CVC malposition is a frequent, multifactorial complication with significant patient safety implications. Multimodal prevention strategies (e.g., ultrasound guidance, appropriate guidewire selection, vigilance during the procedure, and routine post-procedure imaging) can significantly reduce the incidence of CVC malposition and morbidity. Awareness of anatomical variants and technical pitfalls is essential for the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.