Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819617›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026

Sleep duration and quality among Indian anaesthesiologists: A nationwide cross-sectional survey.

Kapil Singhal, Kritika Agrawal, Deepak Thapa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kapil SinghalDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Metro Hospitals and Heart Institute, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8773-3475
Kritika AgrawalDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Metro Hospitals and Heart Institute, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7474-0488
Deepak ThapaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Metro Hospitals and Heart Institute, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9432-6420

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Poor sleep can adversely affect well-being, cognitive function, and decision-making. Anaesthesiologists face unique occupational challenges (irregular shifts, on-call duties, and high stress), which exacerbate sleep disturbances. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of poor sleep among Indian anaesthesiologists and identify associated risk factors. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among Indian anaesthesiologists. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), while data on sleep duration, demographics, work patterns, personal habits, stress, and comorbidities were collected. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with short sleep (<7 hours) and poor sleep quality (PSQI >5). Results: Out of 728 respondents, more than 60% reported short sleep (<7 hours) and more than 50% reported poor sleep quality (PSQI >5). Independent predictors of poor sleep included female gender, more than three night shifts or on-call duties per month, sedentary lifestyle, high home stress, and presence of self-reported sleep disorders. Respondents emphasised the impact of irregular hours, work-life imbalance, and the need for systematic interventions. Conclusion: Poor sleep quality is highly prevalent among Indian anaesthesiologists and is driven by both occupational and personal factors. Structured work schedules and shift patterns and emphasis on lifestyle and stress may improve sleep health and reduce patient risks.

Indexed as

AnaesthesiologistsIndiaquestionnairessleepsleep durationsleep qualitysurveys

Identifiers

PMID42819617
PMCPMC13626510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.