ArticleNeurophotonics2026
Evaluating seed-based and independent component analysis approaches for resting-state functional connectivity mapping with fNIRS.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) is an important measure in advancing our understanding of brain function and development as well as various neurological and mental disorders. Studying RSFC with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) offers several advantages over functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), especially for clinical and pediatric populations. However, the optimal strategy to estimate RSFC based on fNIRS, particularly in identifying reliable connectivity patterns across chromophores, remains unclear. Establishing robust analysis approaches is essential for reliable and clinically meaningful applications. Aim: This study systematically evaluated commonly used analysis methods regarding their effectiveness to detect RSFC patterns within the motor network using both oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (HbR) hemoglobin signals. Approach: Near whole-head resting-state fNIRS data were analyzed from 38 participants. RSFC was estimated with five analytical approaches: three seed-based methods (SBA-GLM, SBA-GLM with respiratory regression, and SBA-Correlation) and two independent component analysis (ICA) approaches using two different contrast functions. Performance was assessed via receiver operating characteristic analyses based on both anatomical and functional definitions of motor-related connectivity. Areas under the curves (AUCs) were statistically compared with DeLong's test, and the spatial similarity between HbO and HbR RSFC was quantified by correlating RSFC patterns from the two chromophores. Results: Across reference definitions and chromophores, ICA consistently achieved higher performance ( Conclusions: ICA provides a robust and consistent framework for estimating fNIRS-based RSFC across both HbO and HbR, outperforming SBA in accuracy and cross-chromophore consistency. While correlational SBA offers a computationally efficient alternative and outperforms GLM-based methods, ICA should be preferred when reliable and chromophore-consistent RSFC estimates are required. Importantly, these findings demonstrate that HbR contains RSFC information comparable to HbO and highlights the critical role of analytical strategy and reference definition in RSFC evaluation. Collectively, these results contribute to the methodological standardization of fNIRS-based RSFC and support its use in future neuroscientific and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.