ArticleCureus2026
Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm With Extensive Intratumoral Hemorrhage.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas occurs predominantly in young women and commonly contains hemorrhagic and degenerative components that can complicate imaging assessment. We report the case of a 19-year-old woman who presented with abdominal distension and decreased appetite. Multiphasic abdominal CT, including an unenhanced phase, demonstrated a well-circumscribed cystic and solid mass in the pancreatic head, with internally hyperattenuating areas on the unenhanced images and mild heterogeneous enhancement of the non-cystic component. MRI demonstrated peripheral and internal intrinsic T1 hyperintensity, compatible with blood products, markedly heterogeneous T2 signal, and restricted diffusion in a non-cystic portion that also showed post-contrast enhancement, along with an enhancing capsule. The measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was approximately 0.98 × 10⁻³ mm²/s. Because clotted blood may also restrict diffusion, the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and ADC findings were interpreted together with the conventional and post-contrast images rather than being used alone to identify viable tumor tissue. The patient underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gross examination revealed a cystic and solid tumor containing abundant bloody fluid, and microscopy confirmed conspicuous hemorrhage. Immunohistochemistry showed nuclear and cytoplasmic β-catenin positivity, nuclear progesterone receptor positivity, and CD10 and vimentin positivity, supporting the diagnosis of SPN. Resection margins and sampled lymph nodes were negative. Correlative analysis of CT and MRI findings with pathological and immunophenotypic features may improve diagnostic confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.