ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Ferroptosis in retinal neurodegeneration: mechanistic vulnerability, therapeutic targeting, and translational barriers.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Progressive retinal neurodegeneration remains a major therapeutic challenge in ophthalmology because structural and functional loss may continue despite control of the primary insult, including intraocular pressure reduction in glaucoma, metabolic management in diabetic retinopathy, or suppression of acute inflammatory activity. Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death driven by phospholipid peroxidation and insufficient antioxidant buffering, has emerged as a potential mechanism linking metabolic stress, ischemic injury, excitotoxicity, and neuroinflammatory signaling to sustained retinal neurovascular unit damage. In this review, we synthesize current evidence supporting ferroptosis-related vulnerability in retinal neurodegenerative diseases. Particular emphasis is placed on expansion of the labile iron pool, PUFA-phospholipid remodeling, dysfunction of the System Xc⁻/glutathione (GSH)/glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) axis, and multicellular amplification within the neuro-glial-microvascular unit. We further compare disease-specific evidence in glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and selected optic nerve injury contexts, emphasizing that causal validation remains uneven across models, cell types, and disease stages. From a translational perspective, we discuss why anti-ferroptotic strategies face distinct ophthalmic barriers, including limited retinal access, insufficient local exposure, short intraocular residence, and safety constraints associated with chronic modulation of iron and redox metabolism. Finally, we evaluate emerging enabling strategies, including nanocarrier-based delivery, long-acting gene modulation, and biomarker frameworks integrating ocular fluids, imaging, multi-omics, and artificial intelligence. Ferroptosis-targeted neuroprotection is therefore best viewed as a disease- and stage-dependent translational framework rather than a universal therapeutic solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.