Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819581›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Conservative Custom Wire and Loop-Assisted Retrieval of a Long Separated Instrument Extending Beyond the Apex: A Case Report.

Maria Thomas, Praveena G, Anjana Ashok, Anulakshmi T P

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria ThomasConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Azeezia College of Dental Sciences and Research, Kollam, IND.
Praveena GConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Azeezia College of Dental Sciences and Research, Kollam, IND.
Anjana AshokConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Azeezia College of Dental Sciences and Research, Kollam, IND.
Anulakshmi T PConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Azeezia College of Dental Sciences and Research, Kollam, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Separation of endodontic instruments is a recognized procedural complication that can hinder effective canal debridement and compromise treatment outcomes, making successful retrieval essential whenever feasible. A 30-year-old female presented with pain in the upper right posterior region associated with tooth 16, diagnosed as asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis with symptomatic apical periodontitis. During root canal treatment, a rotary NiTi file fractured in the mesiobuccal canal and extended beyond the apex. Owing to favorable visibility and fragment length, retrieval was attempted using a conservative combination approach involving ultrasonics for fragment exposure, Masserann trephine troughing, and a custom-made syringe-based wire loop technique. The separated instrument was successfully retrieved, after which canal preparation, obturation, and restoration were completed. This case highlights that the combined use of ultrasonics, the Masserann technique, and a custom wire loop can provide an effective, minimally invasive, and cost-effective method for retrieval of separated instruments in suitable cases.

Indexed as

instrument retrievalmasserann kitroot canal treatmentseparated instrumentultrasonicswire and loop technique

Identifiers

PMID42819581
PMCPMC13624425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.