ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2026
Bioinspired hydrogel-based regenerative engineering strategies for the structural and functional regeneration of skeletal muscles following volumetric muscle loss.
Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skeletal muscle is a highly organized tissue composed of densely packed, uniaxially aligned myofibers that enable directional force generation and normal motor function. Although skeletal muscle has robust endogenous regenerative capacity, this response is overwhelmed by volumetric muscle loss, which heals through fibrosis and scarring rather than functional regeneration, causing permanent structural and functional deficits. Current treatments, including autologous muscle transfer, remain limited by donor-site morbidity, restricted tissue availability and incomplete restoration of muscle form and function. Thus, a major knowledge gap remains: the lack of an implantable, scalable construct capable of recapitulating native muscle architecture, mechanics and function. Skeletal muscle regenerative engineering (SMRE), which integrates suitable cell sources, advanced biomaterials and biomimetic fabrication strategies, offers a promising approach to address this gap. Hydrogels are particularly attractive for SMRE because of their high water content, muscle-like viscoelasticity, tunable properties and compatibility with biochemical functionalization and diverse fabrication methods. Herein, we critically review hydrogel-based SMRE strategies for engineering myo-mimetic skeletal muscle constructs, including cell sources, hydrogel systems, anisotropic organization cues and fabrication methods. We further examine key translational barriers, including vascularization, immune response, cell maturation, scalability and manufacturing reproducibility, and outline actionable future directions for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.