ReviewInternational journal of women's health2026
Shortening the Endometriosis Diagnostic Pathway: A Narrative Review and Research Agenda.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometriosis is often diagnosed several years after the first onset of symptoms; however, the duration of this delay may vary depending on the population studied, the assessment starting point, and the timing of diagnosis. This narrative review, which also utilises a structured evidence mapping methodology, examined interventions aimed at ensuring timely diagnosis across six measurable process domains and distinguished process changes from indirect outcomes. Targeted, iterative searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, guideline databases and reference lists up to 2 August 2026. The review includes 61 sources published between 1996 and 2026, including 23 empirical reports published between 2015 and 2026 that were mapped. The search was not systematic, the screening was not repeated, and no formal bias assessment was carried out. The identified literature provided limited controlled evidence that interventions effectively reduced diagnostic delays; none of the reviews considered diagnostic accuracy, patient outcomes, service demand, cost or equity measures, or timing. Whilst educational initiatives may increase knowledge in the short term, the effectiveness of symptom assessment tools and emerging diagnostic techniques varies across the selected populations. Imaging methods may improve the detection and characterisation of endometriosis; however, a comparative historical analysis indicates changes in the diagnostic pathway and management approach, without quantifying the time elapsed. Current guidelines do not mandate laparoscopy for every patient before establishing a provisional diagnosis and treatment plan. We propose a framework-combining a structured symptom assessment, differential diagnosis, appropriate imaging, diagnostic tests when clinically justified, a safety net, and post-referral follow-up-whose validity has not yet been established. Pragmatic comparative studies are required to determine whether coordinated diagnostic pathways provide earlier, more appropriate and, ultimately, more beneficial care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.