ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in neuroimmune diseases: mechanistic rationale, clinical experience, and translational challenges.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroimmune diseases comprise a heterogeneous group of disorders in which B cells, plasmablasts, plasma cells, autoantibodies, and T cells contribute differently to tissue injury. Although B-cell-directed biologics have improved disease control, some patients continue to experience treatment-refractory activity, relapse after treatment withdrawal, or cumulative neurological disability. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T cell) therapy offers a means of achieving deeper and potentially sustained depletion of defined pathogenic immune-cell compartments. This narrative review integrates the mechanistic rationale, target selection, platform design, published human experience, and translational challenges of CAR-T cell therapy in neuroimmune diseases. Current strategies predominantly target CD19-expressing B-lineage cells or BCMA-expressing antibody-secreting cells; these therapeutic targets are distinct from disease autoantigens, and their relevance depends on the immunopathology of each disorder. CAR design, persistence, lymphodepletion, and the use of integrating or transient expression platforms further influence treatment activity and risk. Clinical development remains uneven across indications. Myasthenia gravis has the most diverse clinical experience, encompassing integrating CD19-, BCMA-, and dual CD19/BCMA-targeted products, together with a transient BCMA-targeted mRNA platform evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2b study. In neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, an open-label phase 1 study has demonstrated early clinical and immunological activity of BCMA-targeted CAR-T cells. Evidence in multiple sclerosis and stiff-person syndrome is derived from individual reports, small early-phase studies, and conference data, whereas experience in other neuroimmune diseases remains limited to isolated reports or small case series. Across indications, interpretation is constrained by small and heterogeneous cohorts, limited follow-up, and the predominance of uncontrolled observations. Major translational considerations include target breadth and selectivity, the contribution of lymphodepletion, the disease-dependent relevance of central nervous system trafficking, acute and delayed toxicity, patient selection, manufacturing feasibility, biomarker development, and standardized long-term outcome assessment. CAR-T cell therapy has shown preliminary clinical activity in selected patients with refractory neuroimmune diseases, but its comparative efficacy, durability, and long-term safety remain undefined. It therefore remains investigational for most neuroimmune indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.