ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Deep cervical stromal invasion predicts poor prognosis in endometrioid endometrial cancer with cervical stromal involvement: a risk-stratification model for adjuvant therapy decision-making in endometrial carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometrioid endometrial cancer with cervical stromal invasion (CSI) has heterogeneous prognoses, but current models inadequately incorporate CSI depth. We evaluated whether deep CSI (≥50% stromal thickness) predicts poor prognosis and developed a risk-stratification model integrating molecular classification to guide adjuvant therapy. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 412 patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer with cervical stromal invasion treated between January 2021 and January 2023. CSI depth was categorized as deep (≥50%) versus superficial (<50%) based on standardized pathological review. Molecular subtyping was performed per 2023 FIGO criteria. The primary endpoint was 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Multivariable Cox regression identified independent prognostic factors. A weighted four-factor risk score was developed incorporating deep CSI (2 points), G3 histology (1 point), substantial lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, 1 point), and p53-aberrant subtype (1 point). Propensity score-matched analysis (1:1 matching) evaluated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) efficacy in deep CSI patients. Results: Deep CSI was present in 71 patients (17.2%) and was associated with aggressive pathological features: higher grade (G3: 35.2% vs. 18.5%, Conclusions: Deep CSI provides critical prognostic information in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Integration of CSI depth with molecular classification enables actionable risk stratification and identifies patients who benefit from EBRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.