ArticleJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience2026
Fostering Belonging Through Introducing Diverse Scientists in Undergraduate Neuroscience Lectures.
Article in Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fostering a sense of belonging in the scientific community is one way to increase the retention of students who belong to groups that have been historically excluded in STEM. In the past several years, I have attempted this in my undergraduate Neurobiology course by introducing students to several neuroscientists with each topic we cover. For each scientist, I spend 2-5 minutes total giving biographical information, introducing an example of the type of research they do, and explaining how their research is related to the lecture topic. The neuroscientists I have included are diverse in racial/ethnic background, gender identity, nationality, sexual orientation, disabilities/abilities, career trajectory, and career stage. Based on an anonymous survey, students overwhelmingly appreciated this aspect of lectures, reported that they are more interested in course material, and were more aware of career options in neuroscience. Students belonging to a group that has been historically under-represented in the sciences were particularly likely to report that they felt more represented in science. Fifty-three percent reported that they are more likely to pursue a career related to neuroscience because of this component of the course. Students said that "meeting" neuroscientists helped them not only realize the diversity of neuroscientists themselves but also the diversity of sub-fields within neuroscience. They also felt more empowered to get involved in research because I included examples of scientists in earlier career stages, such as graduate students, that were more relatable. This is an easy way to make a course more inclusive and can be used in a wide variety of course formats and sizes. It is not time intensive, complements existing course topics, and has a positive impact on students' classroom experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.