Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819451›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in transplantation2026

Psychosocial assessment and follow-up in vascularized composite allotransplantation candidates: clinical observations from the Finnish experience.

Benita Antas, Jan Nyberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benita AntasDepartment of Psychiatry, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jan NybergDepartment of Psychiatry, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychosocial assessment is increasingly recognized as a central component in the evaluation of candidates for vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), yet published clinical perspectives remain limited. Drawing on longitudinal clinical observations of five candidates assessed for VCA, three of whom subsequently underwent transplantation in the Finnish VCA program at Helsinki University Hospital, this article reflects on key considerations shaping psychosocial assessment and follow-up. Psychosocial assessment in VCA requires longitudinal, multidisciplinary information gathering, with the clinical picture evolving across successive encounters. Three interrelated domains appear particularly relevant to clinical assessment: psychosocial functioning, cognitive capacity, and social context. We further propose that the concept of mentalization may offer a useful lens for understanding individuals' abilities to reflect on their illness, expectations, interpersonal relationships, and possible changes following transplantation.

Indexed as

longitudinalmentalizationpsychosocialtransplantationVCA

Identifiers

PMID42819451
PMCPMC13624115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.