Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819440›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2026

From brain drain to geopolitical talent competition: scientific diasporas and the future of Global South development.

Derya Buyuktanir Karacan, Daniel Tapia Takaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Derya Buyuktanir KaracanThe Institute for International Science and Technology (IISPT), Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Daniel Tapia TakakiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific diasporas have emerged as increasingly important actors in global science, technology, and innovation (STI) ecosystems. In the context of geopolitical fragmentation, technological competition, and intensifying global inequalities, talent mobility is no longer solely a migration issue but a strategic dimension of development, science diplomacy, and international influence. This policy review argues that Global South countries should move beyond traditional "brain drain" narratives and instead adopt long-term strategies that view scientific diasporas as transnational development partners and components of broader "networks of networks." Drawing on literature related to scientific diasporas, global talent competition, science diplomacy, and migration studies, this review analyzes how scientific diasporas contribute to development through knowledge transfer, institutional partnerships, capacity building, innovation ecosystems, and policy engagement. It also examines the implications of recent geopolitical shifts, including the growing global competition for talent, technological nationalism, changes in U.S. science and immigration environments, Europe's strategic talent policies, and the rise of emerging scientific hubs beyond the West. Particular attention is given to the Global South, South-South cooperation, reverse brain drain, and the importance of equitable and inclusive knowledge systems. The paper concludes with policy recommendations aimed at strengthening science, technology, and innovation ecosystems and integrating scientific diasporas into national and international development strategies.

Indexed as

Global Southnetwork of networksnetworks and ecosystemsscience diplomacyscience technology and innovation (STI) ecosystemsscientific diasporasSouth–South

Identifiers

PMID42819440
PMCPMC13624078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.