ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Learning from 30 years of systems thinking in healthcare.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systems thinking is a foundational discipline for the quality improvement practitioner. A 1997 publication on building knowledge of healthcare as a system created a bridge between system thinking and quality management, summarized the thinking about systems thinking and quality improvement at that time, and created a 10-step exercise to guide participants in applying systems thinking in their own healthcare settings. During the past 30 years, our understanding of how systems thinking can be applied in healthcare has evolved. We now recognize several limitations to our previous thinking, in particular, the need to distinguish between product logic and service logic. Products are particularly well-suited for quality improvement initiatives that address standardization of linear processes while services are not. Further, we need to consider the role of coproduction for the person seeking care and the relationship and communication with the clinical team. Finally, we must design the system to include care that transcends organizational boundaries. In essence, we need to apply systems thinking to care that is non-linear, involves multiple organizations, and importantly, is coproduced with the patient. We propose a revised and updated systems thinking exercise to help healthcare leaders and patients to apply this discipline in their daily practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.