ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Mechanical characterization and transversely isotropic finite element modelling of sugarcane stalk.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sugarcane stalks are subjected to compression, clamping, bending, feeding, and conveying during mechanised harvesting, but their mechanical behaviour is commonly characterised under individual loading conditions, limiting the representation of directional and longitudinal variability in numerical models. Methods: This study establishes an integrated experimental and modelling framework to characterise these variations and incorporate them into a transversely isotropic finite element model. Mature Guitang 21 stalks were tested at basal and middle internodes using axial compression, radial compression, and three-point bending. Results: The basal internodes exhibited an axial elastic modulus of 96.95 MPa, an equivalent radial deformation parameter of 17.66 MPa, and an equivalent bending response parameter of 174.10 MPa, compared with 65.90 MPa, 14.47 MPa, and 140.39 MPa, respectively, for the middle internodes. Conclusions: These results reveal two consistent mechanical features: substantially greater resistance along the stalk axis than in the radial direction, and systematically greater mechanical resistance in the basal region than in the middle region. The quantified parameters and the validated model provide a basis for refining the design of clamping, feeding, and cutting components in mechanised harvesting machinery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.