Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819391›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The influence of ideological and political education identification on college students' sense of social responsibility.

Jing Lin, Hui-Ling Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jing LinSchool of Marxism, Xiamen Ocean Vocational College, Xiamen, China.
Hui-Ling HuInstitute of Creative Design and Management, National Taipei University of Business, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanisms through which ideological and political education identification influences university students' social responsibility. Drawing on value internalization theory and prosocial behavior perspectives, this research proposes a conceptual model in which ideological and political education identification affects social responsibility through the mediating roles of social empathy and altruistic motivation, with collectivism orientation acting as a moderating variable. A quantitative survey was conducted among undergraduate students in Mainland China, and a total of 530 valid responses were collected. The data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that ideological and political education identification has a significant positive effect on social responsibility. Social empathy and altruistic motivation both play significant mediating roles in this relationship. In addition, collectivism orientation negatively moderates the relationship between altruistic motivation and social responsibility. These findings suggest that the development of social responsibility among university students is shaped by a combination of value identification, emotional processes, motivational mechanisms, and cultural context. This study contributes to the literature by proposing an integrated framework explaining how ideological identification translates into socially responsible behavior among university students. The findings also provide practical implications for higher education institutions seeking to cultivate students' civic responsibility and social engagement.

Indexed as

altruistic motivationcollectivism orientationideological and political education identificationPLS-SEMsocial empathysocial responsibilityuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID42819391
PMCPMC13623930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.