ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Oral health in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: are physicians prepared to integrate it into routine care?
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Poor oral health has been associated with adverse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet its integration into routine COPD care remains poorly understood. This study evaluated physicians' attitudes, confidence, clinical practices, perceived barriers, and factors associated with routine oral health assessment. Methods: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted among general practitioners, pulmonologists, and critical care physicians practising in Saudi Arabia between October 2025 and April 2026. The questionnaire assessed physicians' attitudes, confidence, oral health practices, and perceived barriers related to oral health in COPD. Composite attitude and confidence scores were calculated by averaging responses across the corresponding Likert-scale items. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with routine oral health assessment. Results: A total of 1,095 physicians completed the survey. Routine oral health assessment was infrequent, with only 24.7% reporting that they often or always assessed oral health during COPD care, despite generally neutral to moderately favourable attitudes towards oral health in COPD. Among physicians who assessed oral health at least sometimes, documentation of oral health findings was the most common management strategy (45.2%). The principal barriers were lack of formal training (38.5%), insufficient time (28.1%), uncertainty regarding professional responsibility (24.1%), and the absence of workplace protocols (22.6%). In the multivariable analysis, pulmonologists were more likely than General Practitioners to routinely assess oral health (adjusted OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.11-2.45; Conclusion: Despite generally positive attitudes towards oral health in COPD, routine oral health assessment remains infrequently incorporated into clinical practice. The identified associations highlight potential areas for improving the integration of oral health into COPD care; however, the cross-sectional design does not permit causal inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.