Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819351›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

CAR T cell cancer immunotherapy: who does the job?

Dennis Christoph Harrer, Markus Barden, Hinrich Abken

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dennis Christoph HarrerLeibniz Institute for Immunotherapy, Div. Genetic Immunotherapy, Regensburg, and Chair Genetic Immunotherapy, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Markus BardenLeibniz Institute for Immunotherapy, Div. Genetic Immunotherapy, Regensburg, and Chair Genetic Immunotherapy, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Hinrich AbkenLeibniz Institute for Immunotherapy, Div. Genetic Immunotherapy, Regensburg, and Chair Genetic Immunotherapy, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are capable to eliminate cancer cells in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, yet the efficacy is frequently inconsistent and limited by cancer cell resistance and antigen-loss resulting in early tumor relapses. While CAR T cells are deemed to be the primary effectors in controlling the tumor, maturing evidence indicates that therapeutic outcomes are shaped by a broader immune cell network involving both the endogenous adaptive and innate immunity. In this review, we reframe CAR T cell therapy as the induction of a multi-system immune response rather than a uni-directional cytotoxic cell-autonomous intervention. We discuss the respective contributions of CAR T cells, innate immune cells, and host adaptive immunity in controlling tumor progression and outline strategies to recruit innate immunity using TRUCKs, armored CAR T cells, as well as immunological adjuvants to surmount current limitations. Finally, we address the risks associated with excessive innate immune activation and propose that a calibrated, broad immune cell activation should be viewed as design principle for next-generation CAR T cell therapies.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsHumansImmunity, InnateReceptors, Chimeric Antigenanti-tumor responseCAR - T therapychimeric antigen receptor (CAR)innate cellT cell

Identifiers

PMID42819351
PMCPMC13623909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.