ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation: indications, failure predictors, clinical outcomes, and evidence gaps.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair has re-emerged as a tissue-preserving option for selected proximal tears. Suture tape augmentation may protect the repaired ligament during early healing, but its clinical role remains uncertain because outcomes vary across patient groups and surgical techniques. Methods: A narrative review of PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and reference lists was conducted to identify relevant clinical, imaging, arthroscopic, and biomechanical studies published mainly from 2015 to May 2026. Results: The strongest indications for repair are acute Sherman type I and selected type II proximal tears with an adequate, reducible remnant, good tissue quality, and preserved synovial coverage. Biomechanical evidence supports improved time-zero stability with suture tape augmentation. Clinical studies report satisfactory short- to midterm outcomes in selected adults, whereas younger patients, high-demand athletes, military populations, delayed presentations, and less favorable tear characteristics have higher failure rates. Bridge-enhanced ACL restoration represents a distinct scaffold-assisted preservation strategy and was considered separately. Conclusions: Primary ACL repair with suture tape augmentation is a selective preservation strategy rather than a general substitute for reconstruction. Larger comparative studies using standardized indications, techniques, rehabilitation protocols, and failure definitions are needed to establish its long-term role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.