SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation targets the brain-gut axis to treat functional dyspepsia: a scoping review of clinical evidence and mechanistic research.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common gut-brain interaction disorder with suboptimal response to pharmacotherapy. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), a non-invasive neuromodulation targeting the vagus nerve, has emerged as a promising brain-gut axis therapy. This scoping review (PRISMA-ScR, JBI methodology) synthesizes clinical and preclinical mechanistic evidence on taVNS for FD. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched up to December 20, 2025, following PRISMA-ScR. Using PICOS (adults with FD; taVNS; sham/non-vagal/active controls; symptoms, gastric function, psychological outcomes, biomarkers; RCTs/clinical trials and controlled animal studies), two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed bias (RoB2 for RCTs, SYRCLE for animal studies). A narrative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity. Results: Four RCTs ( Conclusion: This review characterizes taVNS as a safe, well-tolerated, mechanistically plausible non-invasive neuromodulation for FD acting on multiple brain-gut axis nodes. However, the small number of trials, parameter heterogeneity, and limited follow-up constrain definitive conclusions. Adequately powered, multicenter RCTs with standardized protocols and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm efficacy and define optimal regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.