ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
DeepBranchAI: a transferable 3D segmentation model for branching networks.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional branching networks exist throughout biological, natural, and engineered systems as pathways through volumetric space. Segmentation is required to reconstruct these networks for analysis, but minor voxel misclassifications can alter connectivity by falsely disconnecting continuous structures or amplifying spurious branches. Addressing this topological vulnerability requires true 3D segmentation models, since 2D slice-by-slice approaches cannot maintain connectivity across x, y, and z axes. Here, we present DeepBranchAI, a 3D nnU-Net model trained on expert-refined mitochondrial FIB-SEM reference labels as a transferable checkpoint for topology-sensitive segmentation of branching networks. Skeletal-muscle mitochondrial reticulum provides a dense and heterogeneous branching-network training target, and FIB-SEM captures this structure with isotropic nanometer-scale detail. Training on this dataset produced a 3D checkpoint with DSC = 0.942 ± 0.020 across five-fold mitochondrial FIB-SEM validation, providing the basis for subsequent transfer-learning experiments. Transfer learning was evaluated with five-fold cross-validation on paired image/reference-label datasets from 3D-IRCADb venous segmentation, Plant CT roots, and AeroPath airway CT, using continuity-sensitive measures including clDice and absolute connected-component error. Across the external datasets, DeepBranchAI-pretrained fine-tuning had higher mean clDice than scratch nnU-Net. Relative differences in mean clDice were 11.7% for 3D-IRCADb, 5.5% for Plant CT roots, and 1.9% for AeroPath. Mean absolute connected-component error was 25.0% lower for Plant CT roots and 11.7% lower for AeroPath. In 3D-IRCADb, DeepBranchAI-pretrained fine-tuning also had higher mean Dice and clDice than VesselFM, 0.679 versus 0.464 and 0.629 versus 0.360, respectively. The transfer results suggest that training on structurally heterogeneous skeletal-muscle mitochondrial networks can produce 3D features useful beyond the original FIB-SEM domain. Code, trained weights, external-transfer scripts, and validation tables are provided as open-source resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.