ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Active learning for data-efficient segmentation of tea buds and leaves.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate recognition and segmentation of tea buds and leaves is critical for precision tea management. However, developing robust vision models for tea bud and leaf segmentation typically requires large volumes of manually annotated data, which are costly and time-consuming to obtain. To address this challenge, we propose an active learning framework for data-efficient segmentation of tea buds and leaves. The proposed framework adopts an iterative training strategy that begins with a small set of labeled images and progressively improves the segmentation model by selectively annotating the most informative unlabeled samples. These samples are identified using mean confidence scores from a YOLO-based segmentation network, prioritizing uncertain instances to maximize learning efficiency. The proposed approach is evaluated using multi-view image datasets collected from tea plantations, including top-down and 45° perspectives, to investigate the influence of camera viewpoint on segmentation performance. In addition, segmentation accuracy is assessed across different tea plucking standards, including single buds, one-bud-one-leaf, and one-bud-two-leaves. Experiments show that, under the same annotation budget, the proposed framework achieves more than 10% higher accuracy compared to random sample selection. The performance gains are even more pronounced for 45° imaging, where our method outperforms random annotation by 14.7% in mAP@0.5 overall and by 19.0% specifically for bud detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.