Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819267›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Active learning for data-efficient segmentation of tea buds and leaves.

Zhaodong Wang, Wenzhi Liao, Yang Li, Zhengyu Xiong, Faliang Wang, Kun Hu, Hao You, Qiang Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhaodong WangResearch and Innovation Group of Detection Technology and Intelligent Control, School of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Jingdezhen University, Jingdezhen, China.
Wenzhi LiaoDepartment of Telecommunications and Information Processing, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Yang LiKey Laboratory of Tea Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Zhengyu XiongResearch and Innovation Group of Detection Technology and Intelligent Control, School of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Jingdezhen University, Jingdezhen, China.
Faliang WangResearch and Innovation Group of Detection Technology and Intelligent Control, School of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Jingdezhen University, Jingdezhen, China.
Kun HuResearch and Innovation Group of Detection Technology and Intelligent Control, School of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Jingdezhen University, Jingdezhen, China.
Hao YouResearch and Innovation Group of Detection Technology and Intelligent Control, School of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Jingdezhen University, Jingdezhen, China.
Qiang XiaoKey Laboratory of Tea Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate recognition and segmentation of tea buds and leaves is critical for precision tea management. However, developing robust vision models for tea bud and leaf segmentation typically requires large volumes of manually annotated data, which are costly and time-consuming to obtain. To address this challenge, we propose an active learning framework for data-efficient segmentation of tea buds and leaves. The proposed framework adopts an iterative training strategy that begins with a small set of labeled images and progressively improves the segmentation model by selectively annotating the most informative unlabeled samples. These samples are identified using mean confidence scores from a YOLO-based segmentation network, prioritizing uncertain instances to maximize learning efficiency. The proposed approach is evaluated using multi-view image datasets collected from tea plantations, including top-down and 45° perspectives, to investigate the influence of camera viewpoint on segmentation performance. In addition, segmentation accuracy is assessed across different tea plucking standards, including single buds, one-bud-one-leaf, and one-bud-two-leaves. Experiments show that, under the same annotation budget, the proposed framework achieves more than 10% higher accuracy compared to random sample selection. The performance gains are even more pronounced for 45° imaging, where our method outperforms random annotation by 14.7% in mAP@0.5 overall and by 19.0% specifically for bud detection.

Indexed as

active learningimage segmentationmulti-view imagingprecision agriculturetea bud detection

Identifiers

PMID42819267
PMCPMC13623861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.