ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and internal validation of a preliminary model for
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although Objective: To develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model for Hp infection using demographic, lifestyle, altitude-related, and clinical variables. Methods: This multicenter cross-sectional study included 2034 participants recruited from three medical institutions in Qinghai Province, China, between November 2025 and March 2026. Hp infection status was determined using the ^13C-urea breath test. Participants were randomly assigned to a training set ( Results: Seven predictors were ultimately retained in the final model, including educational level, vegetable consumption, tooth brushing frequency, halitosis, family history of Hp infection, chronic gastritis, and high-altitude residence. The model demonstrated good discrimination, with area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 0.774 in the training set and 0.756 in the validation set. Calibration analysis demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities, with mean absolute errors of 0.018 and 0.037 in the training and validation sets, respectively. Decision curve analysis demonstrated consistent net clinical benefit in both sets. Conclusions: We developed and internally validated a prediction model for Hp infection incorporating seven readily obtainable variables. The model demonstrated satisfactory discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility and may facilitate individualized risk stratification and targeted screening strategies, particularly in high-altitude and geographically diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.