ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Cervical cancer prevention in Riyadh: a cross-sectional analysis of sociodemographic correlates, knowledge-awareness-practice gaps, and healthcare provider influence.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Cervical cancer prevention continues to pose a significant public health challenge in Saudi Arabia. This research aimed to evaluate women's knowledge, awareness, and behaviors related to cervical cancer screening and Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Riyadh, and to identify key factors influencing participation and the obstacles faced. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among a diverse sample of women recruited through online platforms, institutional networks, and community-based groups. Data collection involved a structured questionnaire covering sociodemographic details, knowledge, awareness, practices, and barriers. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, gap analysis, and multivariable regression using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v28.0. Results: Awareness of Papanicolaou (Pap) smear was high at 77.8%, but actual screening participation was low at 26.7%. HPV vaccine awareness was 42.0%, yet only 9.3% had received the vaccine. Knowledge levels varied: 82.0% understood the purpose of the Pap smear, but just 20.4% knew the recommended screening intervals. The main barriers included a lack of understanding (43.4%) and limited awareness of testing locations (17.1%). Regression analysis showed that awareness of the HPV vaccine significantly predicted knowledge (β = 1.903, p < 0.001), and that advice from physicians doubled vaccination rates compared with other sources. Conclusions: A notable gap exists between awareness and practice, mainly due to knowledge deficits rather than access issues. Future efforts should focus on provider-led, behavior-oriented education to convert awareness into action and lessen the cervical cancer burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.