ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Case Report: PRaG 3.0 therapy for advanced cervical cancer with severe comorbidities.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with advanced cervical cancer complicated by renal dysfunction and severe anemia are frequently ineligible for standard platinum-based chemotherapy, creating an urgent need for effective non-platinum salvage strategies. We report a patient with FIGO stage IVB poorly differentiated cervical squamous cell carcinoma with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ expression, acute kidney injury caused by malignant ureteral obstruction (serum creatinine, 793 μmol/L), and severe anemia (hemoglobin, 47 g/L) at presentation. After bilateral nephrostomy, the patient received PRaG 3.0, a five-component regimen comprising stereotactic body radiotherapy, adebrelimab (anti-PD-L1), disitamab vedotin (HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and interleukin-2. After two cycles, both the cervical primary lesion and pulmonary metastases showed marked regression, and the best overall response was partial response. Treatment was generally manageable; the only grade 3 treatment-related adverse event was an interleukin-2-associated generalized rash, which resolved after drug discontinuation and supportive care. At the last follow-up, progression-free survival exceeded 8 months, and both nephrostomy tubes had been removed. This case suggests that PRaG 3.0 may provide clinically meaningful disease control in selected patients with advanced cervical cancer and severe comorbidities who cannot tolerate platinum-based chemotherapy. Given the single-patient nature of this report, prospective validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.