Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819100›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

A review of full-stack autonomous obstacle avoidance for assistive robots for the disabled.

Yuan Zhang, Shuo Wang, Changlong Zhao, Wei Li, Zhenrong Shi, Meng Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuan ZhangCollege of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Changchun University, Changchun, China.
Shuo WangCollege of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Changchun University, Changchun, China.
Changlong ZhaoCollege of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Changchun University, Changchun, China.
Wei LiCollege of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Changchun University, Changchun, China.
Zhenrong ShiCollege of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Changchun University, Changchun, China.
Meng LiuCollege of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Changchun University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the intensification of population aging and the increasing awareness of protecting the rights of the disabled, significant progress has been made in assistive robots for visually impaired people, the mobility impairments and other groups. Research in this field focuses on four key technical dimensions: environmental perception, obstacle recognition and classification, path planning and obstacle avoidance algorithms, and scenario-based applications. This analysis particularly focuses on the ability of multi-sensor fusion to acquire spatial information in complex and dynamic environments, and reviews the technological evolution in target detection, semantic understanding, and passable area determination. The work further explores algorithms ranging from global path planning to local obstacle avoidance strategies, as well as reinforcement learning and multi-algorithm integration. Furthermore, this narrative review synthesizes the current research on assistive technologies, including guide robots for the visually impaired, intelligent mobility platforms for wheelchair users, and solutions adaptable to both indoor and outdoor environments. The insights derived from this review offer a reliable foundation to support the travel and daily activities of people with disabilities.

Indexed as

environmental perceptionmulti-algorithm integrationobstacle recognitionpath planningscenario-based applications

Identifiers

PMID42819100
PMCPMC13624973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.