Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818978›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026

Perioperative analgesic management using conventional versus regional nerve block in craniotomy surgeries in lower middle-income countries.

Dileep Kumar, Aqsa Rasheed, Mohsin Nazir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dileep KumarDileep Kumar, Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesia, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Aqsa RasheedAqsa Rasheed, Resident Trainee, Department of Anesthesia, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Mohsin NazirMohsin Nazir, Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesia, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study's primary objective was to assess the efficacy of systemic opioids with pre-incision bilateral scalp nerve block for supratentorial craniotomy pain via intraoperative hemodynamic variables at different intervals. The secondary objective was to assess the postoperative pain, rescue analgesia requirement, sedation, nausea and vomiting in first 24 hours of surgery. Methodology: This double-blinded randomized controlled trial, conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi. The 62 adult patients (ASA I-III), recruited for elective supratentorial craniotomy via randomization into two groups (n=31/group). Group-M received intravenous morphine (0.1 mg/kg) at induction. Group-S received bilateral SNB with lidocaine, ropivacaine, adrenaline, and dexamethasone. The heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were recorded at predefined intraoperative intervals. Postoperatively, both participants received PCIA morphine, and pain was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), along with sedation, nausea and vomiting incidences, which were recorded in first 24 hours at various intervals. Results: The demographic and surgical characteristics were insignificant in both groups ( Conclusion: Pre-incisional scalp nerve block provides better attenuation of intraoperative noxious stimuli via hemodynamic control, and it shows superior postoperative analgesia, without risking the sedation, nausea and vomiting in supratentorial craniotomy surgeries.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaCraniotomyMorphineNeurosurgeryPainScalp Nerve Block

Identifiers

PMID42818978
PMCPMC13624456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.