Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818963›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

An Automated, Contamination-Controlled VQA Benchmark for Evaluating Vision-Language Models on 3D Oncology Imaging.

Bo Liu, Hanxue Gu, Xiangru Li, Zheren Zhu, Jacob Ellison, Kang Wang, Ke Sheng, Steve Braunstein, Janine Lupo, Yang Yang and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bo LiuUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Hanxue GuUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Xiangru LiUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Zheren ZhuUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Jacob EllisonUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Kang WangUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Ke ShengUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Steve BraunsteinUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Janine LupoUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Yang YangUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Hui LinUniversity of California, San Francisco.

Funding

Multi-Modality Modeling of Glioblastoma Progression: Integrating DTI and Prognostic Biomarkers for Personalized Radiation Therapy TargetingR21CA303378 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Hui Lin · 2026 to 2026
$414k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA303378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly applied to medical imaging, yet public benchmarks may reward memorization over perception: their images and questions can enter pretraining corpora, and many items remain answerable from question text alone. We present an automated, agent-driven pipeline that builds multiple-choice benchmarks directly from paired private radiology reports and three-dimensional oncology imaging. It generates two complementary question types: schema-driven items populated deterministically from established reporting frameworks, and report-derived items verified against the source text. Because the source reports are private and single-institution, the resulting questions cannot have entered any model's pretraining data, controlling instance-level contamination by construction. We applied the pipeline to four oncology cohorts (liver CT, liver MRI, lung CT and brain MRI; 2,509 cases and 33,870 questions) and evaluated five contemporary VLMs zero-shot. Accuracies ranged from 0.28 to 0.81 and no model was reliable across cohorts. Replacing the image with a blank input changed accuracy little for the highest-scoring models, and on schema-driven brain questions frontier models scored 0.17-0.19 higher on public than on matched private imaging. The benchmark thus separates image-dependent performance from question-text and dataset-familiarity effects, and the released pipeline lets institutions regenerate it on their own reports and images.

Identifiers

PMID42818963
PMCPMC13622859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.