ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Reframing Chronicity in Research and Care: A Patient-Informed Framework of Pain Adaptation.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic pain is a complex and heterogeneous condition shaped by interactions among biological processes, psychological responses, behaviors, environmental contexts, cultural and structural constraints. Yet many prevailing models remain static, insufficiently capturing how patient experiences evolve over time, particularly during the transition from acute to chronic pain. This conceptual paper advances a patient-informed conceptual framework developed through qualitative research conducted within a National Institutes of Health-funded study on patient preferences and appropriateness of care. The Chronic Adaptive Resilience & Endurance (CARE) Framework of Pain situates pain along an acute to chronic continuum and identifies a critical experiential shift from cure-seeking to coping-oriented goals. It also conceptualizes chronic pain as an adaptive process characterized by feedback loops between pain and everyday life that encompasses cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and environmental domains. Distinct from traditional biopsychosocial models, this framework highlights patient assessments, treatment preferences, individual capacity for treatment seeking and disease management, medical mistrust due to prior healthcare experiences, and economic resources as crucial influences that shape recovery trajectories and treatment engagement. By reframing chronicity as a reorganization of goals rather than a simple temporal threshold, the CARE Framework seeks to describe the patient experience of chronicity in greater depth. Finally, this framework expands on prior literature that describe a shift in focus from pain reduction to functional improvement as a marker of treatment success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.