Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818886›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026

Lineage-resolved lifetime modelling reveals potential quiescence and synchronization among MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells.

Mónica Suárez Korsnes, Ellen Marie Botne Quinsgaard, Siver Andreas Moestue, Reinert Korsnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mónica Suárez KorsnesDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Ellen Marie Botne QuinsgaardDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Siver Andreas MoestueDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Reinert KorsnesKorsnes Biocomputing (KoBio), Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents evidence of a previously unrecognised structured organisation of untreated cancer cell lineages and suggests an unexpected sensitivity to subtle experimental perturbations that is not readily explained by standard population models. These conclusions are based on exploratory analyses of cell-tracking data from untreated MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells cultured under standard conditions. The analyses indicate that lineage-tracking data can reveal multiple layers of heterogeneity, synchronisation, and ancestry, together with stable quiescent, senescence-like, or persister-like states, even in the absence of external perturbation. These findings are hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory and are intended to motivate future studies designed to test these hypotheses. The analysis is based on 72-h recordings from one or two wells in each of 21 independent experiments, comprising trajectories of 4,000 initial cells and their 34,152 descendants. During observation, 238 (6%) of the initial cells died, whereas 39 (1%) survived without dividing. The lifetimes of initial cells that died are well described by a conventional mixed gamma distribution, but the observed number of non-dividing survivors exceeds model predictions, suggesting a subpopulation with prolonged quiescent or senescence-like behaviour. The study further explores information extracted from healthy pedigree trees, defined by three consecutive normal cell divisions from the start of recording and no subsequent cell death. Only 22% of the 4,000 pedigree trees satisfy these criteria; the remainder exhibit abnormal divisions, prolonged intermitotic times, or cell death. Basic renewal theory indicates that initial cells tend to delay their first division, consistent with systematic differences between first- and second-generation intermitotic times. Finally, comparisons of pooled and experiment-specific lifetime distributions identify information-theoretic "elements of surprise". Unexpectedly pronounced local maxima in empirical probability densities suggest high sensitivity to experimental conditions and may also reflect cellular synchronisation through intercellular communication together with ancestry-dependent inheritance.

Indexed as

heritageintermitotic timelineage tracingpersister-likesingle-cell trackingsister cellssynchronisation

Identifiers

PMID42818886
PMCPMC13624361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.