ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2026
Systematic review protocol on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among lactating people.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lactating people experiencing SARS-CoV-2 infection encounter physical, emotional, and psychosocial challenges during the postpartum period compared to the general population. Despite the importance of COVID-19 vaccination globally, campaigns aimed at vaccinating at-risk populations, including pregnant and lactating people (PLP), have faced challenges, leading to a low uptake among PLP. The objectives of this study are to discover lactating people's perceptions toward COVID-19 vaccination uptake and to explore facilitators and barriers that inform their COVID-19 vaccination decision process. Methods: The search will be carried out using the MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, Embase and Scopus databases. The search will utilise Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords to optimise results. The MeSH terms used will include 'breastfeeding OR lactation', 'COVID-19 vaccine', and 'vaccination hesitancy', along with various iterations of these keywords. Boolean operators 'AND' and 'OR' will be applied to expand the search scope. The search criteria will be limited to recent articles published between 2020 and 2026, in English, and with available abstracts. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full texts, while two reviewers will extract data. Study selection will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol guidelines, and study quality will be evaluated using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-sectional Studies (AXIS), JBI qualitative checklist and MMAT. Result: Data will be analysed thematically following the approach outlined by Braun & Clarke (2006), presenting findings as a narrative summary. Conclusion: This review will help to design clear communication and targeted campaigns, building trust in vaccine safety and effectiveness. Ethics and dissemination: No formal ethical approval is necessary since this study does not involve the collection of primary data. The findings will be shared via a peer-reviewed journal article and presented at conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.