Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818808›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Infant mortality across EU health systems: heterogeneity encoding, fixed effects regression, and machine learning in a small macro panel.

Ecmel Kisa, Adnan Kisa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ecmel KisaDepartment of Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, Kristiania University of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Adnan KisaDepartment of Health and Exercise, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, Kristiania University of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The infant mortality rate is widely used in comparative health research, but less is known about how panel regression and machine-learning models perform in small macro-level health datasets when they are evaluated using comparable information and the same out-of-period test period. Methods: Using a balanced panel of 25 European Union countries observed annually from 2000 to 2022 (575 country-year observations, no missing data) assembled from OECD and World Bank sources, we separated an explanatory analysis from a predictive analysis. The explanatory layer used a two-way fixed effects regression with country-clustered standard errors. The predictive layer trained pooled linear regression, tuned Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and a Multilayer Perceptron, with and without explicit country information, on 2000-2017 and evaluated them on a held-out 2018-2022 window, alongside two naive benchmarks (persistence and historical country mean) and two prediction-compatible fixed effects specifications. Hyperparameters were tuned by expanding-window temporal cross-validation within the training period, leaving the test window untouched. Results: Under common out-of-period evaluation, a simple persistence benchmark achieved the strongest predictive performance (R Conclusion: In this EU infant-mortality panel, much of the predictive signal came from persistent country-specific outcome history. Country information improved the tree-based models, while model flexibility also remained important. The strong within-panel fit of the fixed-effects model did not translate into strong out-of-period prediction.

Indexed as

European Unionfixed effectsheterogeneity encodinginfant mortalitymachine learningpanel datapredictive validation

Identifiers

PMID42818808
PMCPMC13624104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.