ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Human single-neuron recordings reveal population coding of attentional dynamics during naturalistic movie viewing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our eyes move constantly. Where they land is shaped by internal cognitive state, making eye movements a rare, non-invasive window onto that state. However, how moment-to-moment eye-movements map onto human neural population activity during naturalistic viewing remains poorly characterized. We analyzed a public intracranial dataset in which 14 neurosurgical patients watched an eight-minute movie during simultaneous eye-tracking and neuronal activity recording. Single-neuron activity from 814 neurons across anterior cingulate cortex, pre-supplementary motor area, amygdala, hippocampus, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex was pooled into a single distributed population and related to a joint eye-movement state comprising pupil size, saccade rate and fixation duration. Using a cross-validated, multivariate analysis of population activity we found group-level coupling between the neural population and the joint eye-movement state (mean held-out canonical r = 0.145; one-sample t-test p = 0.0003; 9 of 14 subjects individually significant). The coupling was carried principally by saccade dynamics (r = 0.141) and pupil size (r = 0.094), with fixation duration contributing only marginally (r = 0.041). At the single-neuron level the picture differed: more neurons were eye-coupled than expected by chance, yet so weakly that almost none survived correction for multiple comparisons. Read out jointly, the same weakly coupled cells cohered into one reliable population dimension, and no single region's removal significantly reduced it. This pattern is more consistent with a distributed, redundant organization than with a small set of strongly coupled cells. In summary, eye-tracking offers a non-invasive window onto population-level neural states in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.