SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2026
Effectiveness of chatbot interventions in individuals for hypertension management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hypertension is a major global risk factor for cardiovascular disease and requires long-term management. Recently, digital health tools such as chatbots have been introduced to support patient self-management. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of chatbot interventions designed for individual hypertension management evaluating their impact on clinical outcomes, primarily changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and to explore the improvement in knowledge and self-management skills, as well as implementation outcomes such as feasibility, acceptability, and adoption in routine healthcare settings. Materials and methods: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The research question was structured by the PICOT framework, focusing on patients with hypertension or elevated Blood Pressure (BP) receiving chatbot-based interventions compared with usual care or other digital approaches, with outcomes including changes in systolic and diastolic BP, medication adherence, behaviour changes, implementation outcomes, and improvement in knowledge and self-management skills. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science for studies published from 2015 onwards, identifying 316 studies, of which 177 underwent title and abstract screening and 9 were finally included. Two independent reviewers performed screening and full-text review and assessed quality using Covidence. Inter-Rater Reliability (IRR) was assessed using pairwise Cohen's Kappa ( Results: Evidence is heterogeneous and mostly low-to-moderate certainty. Chatbot interventions were associated with improvements in both Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), medication adherence, and adherence to home BP monitoring. Improvements in self-monitoring and engagement were more consistent across studies, while BP and medication adherence outcomes varied, with some studies reporting limited or non-significant effects. Discussion/conclusion: Chatbot interventions show potential as an accessible tool to support hypertension self-management. They may help improve patient engagement and monitoring behaviours, however, their effects on BP and medication adherence vary and may depend on intervention design and how they are used in practice. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251172042, PROSPERO CRD420251172042.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.