ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
ATAC-seq and MNase-seq Detect Distinct Modes of Chromatin Accessibility.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromatin accessibility shapes the ability of transcription factors (TFs) and the transcriptional machinery to engage genomic DNA and therefore plays a central role in gene regulation. Two widely used approaches for profiling chromatin accessibility are micrococcal nuclease (MNase)-seq and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin (ATAC)-seq. ATAC-seq peaks are often thought to be equivalent to nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs) that are defined by MNase-seq; however, these two measurements have not been systematically compared. Here, we perform a side-by-side comparison of ATAC-seq and MNase-seq in budding yeast and find a large discrepancy between ATAC-seq peaks and MNase-defined NDRs. We show that this discrepancy is not primarily due to the intrinsic differences between MNase and Tn5 enzymatic activity. Instead, ATAC-seq peaks and NDRs capture distinct chromatin states. Specifically, ATAC-seq peaks are enriched at dynamic nucleosomes associated with transcriptional co-regulators, including SAGA and SWI/SNF, whereas ATAC- NDRs mark more static nucleosome-free regions at promoters. Depletion of SWI/SNF reduces ATAC-seq signals without affecting most NDRs. Generation of NDRs and ATAC-seq peaks requires distinct TF properties, and native TFs differ in their ability to produce these two types of open chromatin. Finally, we find that the functional distinctions between ATAC-seq peaks and NDRs are widespread across eukaryotic species, including human cells. Together, our results provide new insights into the biological meaning of chromatin accessibility measured by these two assays.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.