ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Predicting Capsid Protein Binding Sites in Single-Stranded RNA Viruses Using Machine Learning from Local Geometric Features.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intracellular pathogen manipulation of ER-phagy: direct receptor targeting and indirect pathway perturbation.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selective recognition of viral RNA by capsid proteins is essential for genome packaging during the assembly of single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) viruses. However, identification of capsid protein binding sites in the RNA genome remains challenging because current experimental techniques are labor-intensive and low-throughput, motivating the development of computational approaches. Here, we present a sequence-based framework that integrates RNA tertiary structural modeling, local geometric feature extraction, and machine learning to predict capsid protein binding sites. Using the Qβ bacteriophage as a proof-of-concept system, we constructed a benchmark dataset of experimentally identified binding and non-binding RNA fragments. We designed a set of geometric descriptors to characterize the local structural features of the RNA backbone. When repeatedly trained and tested with these geometric descriptors on different subsets of the benchmark dataset, the neural network showed a strong ability to distinguish capsid protein binding sites from non-binding RNA fragments, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.88 in a 5-fold cross-validation. To evaluate whether the model can predict RNA binding sites without experimental structures, we applied it to local geometric features derived from AlphaFold-predicted RNA structures. Despite substantial structural differences between predicted and experimentally determined models, the classifier retained considerable predictive performance (AUC = 0.75), indicating that approximate RNA tertiary structures may still preserve biologically meaningful information for capsid binding site prediction. Furthermore, the failed predictions suggest that viral genome packaging is not only governed by intrinsic RNA structural features, but also by additional dynamic factors beyond static RNA conformations. In summary, our findings provide new mechanistic insights into RNA-capsid interactions and establish a foundation for extending this approach to diverse ssRNA viruses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.