ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Temporal Indexing of Motor Memory.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans must store and retrieve distinct implicit motor memories in different contexts. Recent research has revealed the motor adaptation system's sensitivity to contextual cues related to posture, spatial goals, and visual inputs. However, to date, the role of one critical variable in implicit motor memory retrieval - the passage of time - remains underexplored, even though it is arguably more fundamental. Here we ask if different temporal intervals can act as effective contextual cues for retrieving competing motor adaptation memories at the subsecond level. We combined a visuomotor dual adaptation paradigm with a 'set-go' task to link opposite perturbation contexts with different movement preparation intervals. The preparation intervals (and their associated perturbations) were randomly interleaved during training, leading to consistent interference. After training, a testing phase revealed robust contextual modulation effects, such that distinct implicit motor memories were retrieved based on the time elapsed during the pre-movement preparatory interval. These contextual memory effects generalized to novel preparatory intervals in a highly structured fashion. Contextual motor memory separation was seen both when elapsed time had to be internally tracked (high uncertainty) and when it was aided by visual and symbolic cues (low uncertainty). Learning and generalization data across experiments could be parsimoniously explained by a computational model that indexed motor memories via a cerebellar granule-cell-like temporal basis set that tiled the delay interval. Our findings suggest that intrinsic timing processes in the cerebellum may function to index motor memories and generalize those memories to new temporal contexts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.