ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
A landmark-based dynamic prediction model for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: integrating perioperative and postoperative trajectories.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a severe complication after radical surgery for rectal cancer. Current prediction models rely mainly on static variables and may not capture evolving perioperative physiological stress. This study developed and validated a twostage landmark-based dynamic prediction model that integrates baseline clinical features with postoperative inflammatory trajectories for individualized AL risk stratification. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 815 patients who underwent radical rectal cancer resection. A consensus feature set was derived by majority voting across four feature-selection pipelines: LASSO, RF-MDA, SVM-RFE, and stepwise AIC. Model 1 used preoperative and intraoperative variables to estimate AL risk immediately after surgery. Model 2 sequentially incorporated early postoperative dynamic indicators. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: AL occurred in 82 of 815 patients (10.1%). The multi-algorithm consensus strategy identified 16 core baseline variables. Model 1 showed strong discrimination, with an AUC of 0.825 (95% CI, 0.774-0.875). After incorporating early postoperative dynamic parameters, including longitudinal neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio trajectory clusters and acute hypoalbuminemia, Model 2 improved the AUC to 0.889 (95% CI, 0.848-0.930; DeLong test, Conclusions: This two-stage landmark-based dynamic prediction framework improves early warning for AL by combining baseline risk factors with postoperative inflammatory dynamics. The model may support more precise perioperative risk stratification and earlier individualized intervention after radical rectal cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.