ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Establishment and preliminary evaluation of an RT-ERA combined with CRISPR/Cas12a assay for detection of H5 and H7 influenza viruses.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objectives: Novel influenza A viruses (NIAV) infection is a zoonotic acute respiratory disease. The H5N1 and H7N9 subtypes cause high mortality, posing major public health threats. This study aimed to establish rapid, field-deployable subtype-specific nucleic acid detection assays for H5 and H7 by integrating reverse-transcription enzymatic recombinase amplification (RT-ERA) with CRISPR/Cas12a. Two separate reactions are required per sample. Methods: Conserved hemagglutinin (H) sequences were retrieved from the NCBI database, and primers, probes, and crRNAs were designed using Primer Premier 5 and Primer-BLAST. The sensitivity of RT-ERA alone was compared with that of the ERA-CRISPR/Cas12a using serially diluted virus strain nucleic acid. The specificity was verified against other respiratory pathogens with similar clinical manifestations. Results: The optimal primers were F1R2 for H5 and F2R3 for H7. The limit of detection (LOD) of RT-ERA alone was 2.63×10³ copies/µL for H5 and 1.86×10³ copies/µL for H7; the ERA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay improved the LOD to 2.63×10¹ copies/µL for H5 and 1.86 copies/µL for H7, representing 100-fold and 1000-fold enhancements in sensitivity, respectively. Specificity testing showed that the assay exclusively detected H5N1 and H7N9 with no cross-reactivity to other tested pathogens. Conclusion: The ERA-CRISPR/Cas12a method exhibits enhanced sensitivity for H5 and H7 subtypes detection, along with high specificity, rapidity, and minimal equipment requirements. It offers a promising screening tool for NIAV infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.