ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
A structured learning curve for visuomotor recalibration and surgical performance during transition from two-dimensional to three-dimensional laparoscopic radical cystectomy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy offers stereoscopic depth perception, but moving from conventional two-dimensional (2D) systems calls for a period of visuomotor adaptation. How this learning curve unfolds in complex oncological procedures like laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) has not been well characterized. Methods: This single-surgeon retrospective cohort study included 140 consecutive patients who underwent LRC by an experienced surgeon (>300 prior 2D procedures). Cases were divided chronologically into one 2D group (the last 50 2D cases) and three consecutive 3D groups (3D-1 to 3D-3, 30 cases each). The primary endpoint was pelvic-phase operative time- the vision-dependent part of dissection. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), lymph node yield, positive margin rate, major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥II), and surgeon-rated stereoscopic comfort and hand-eye coordination (visual analogue scales). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. Change-point analysis identified a single significant transition point at case 31 (95% CI: 28-34). Pelvic-phase time in 3D-1 group (median 198 min) was comparable to the 2D reference (185 min, Conclusions: Transitioning from 2D to 3D LRC involves a distinct learning curve of about 30 cases. Once visuomotor recalibration is achieved, operative efficiency and intraoperative safety improve substantially without compromising pathological quality. These findings offer an evidence-based framework for structured training and technology adoption in complex pelvic oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.