ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Flexible reorientation of conserved neural dynamics underlies grasp control.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grasping objects is a complex behavior requiring high-dimensional hand control and dynamic interaction with the environment, yet its neural mechanisms remain poorly understood. Dynamical systems approaches have provided key insights into how neural populations generate control signals for arm movements such as reaching and cycling but have proven insufficient to account for neural population activity during grasping. Here, we re-analyzed multi-area neural recordings from rhesus monkeys performing a reach-to-grasp task to many objects and found two key population-level features. First, the component of the population trajectory that was common to all grasps formed a small angle with the subspace containing grasp condition-specific (object) tuning. Second, the neural activity was well fitted by a recent, flexible dynamical model developed for reaching, called location-dependent rotations (LDR). Neural activity in M1 and F5 during grasping exhibited conserved population-level rotational frequencies, but the state-space planes in which these rotations occurred varied systematically with grasp condition. The rotational center (the "location") and the orientation of the rotations related both to each other and to the kinematics of movement. While these rotations were reoriented in high dimensional space, reflecting the high-dimensional nature of hand control, the extent of their tilt into additional dimensions were small, in contrast to reaching. This structure may reflect the nature of grasping as modulations of an overall open-close motif. Together, these results indicate that the LDR dynamics framework applies to grasping as well as reaching and provides an entry point to understanding how grasp commands are generated.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.