ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Awareness, attitudes, and utilization of large language models among healthcare students in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are increasingly adopted in health professions education worldwide, yet evidence on their use among healthcare students in the Middle East remains limited. Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed awareness, attitudes, and utilization of LLMs among healthcare students across Saudi Arabian universities using a self-administered online questionnaire, adapted from a previously published instrument, distributed to healthcare students at multiple Saudi universities between April and August 2025. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to compare responses by sex. Of 449 responses collected, 441 provided informed consent; after applying eligibility criteria, 435 were included in the final analysis (70.3% female; median age 21.0 years). Results: Most students (78%) reported familiarity with LLMs and 87% agreed they are useful for both students and educators, though 75% acknowledged the risk of inaccurate information and only 18% had attended formal LLM training. Female students reported significantly higher perceived usefulness of LLMs than males ( Discussion: These findings reveal a substantial gap between LLM adoption and structured AI-literacy training among healthcare students in Saudi Arabia, suggesting a need for curricula that build critical appraisal and verification skills alongside safe LLM use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.