Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818595›Full record

ArticleBJR artificial intelligence2026

Federated artificial intelligence monitoring service (FAMOS): an in silico feasibility study.

Aysha Luis, Andrew Scarsbrook, Mariusz Grzeda, Jesus Perdomo Lampignano, Matt Clark, Bob Wheller, Jack Baldwin, James Cairns, Simran Dhesi, Mark Hall and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aysha LuisNewton's Tree, London, W1B 1NT, United Kingdom.
Andrew ScarsbrookRadiology.Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4243-032X
Mariusz GrzedaUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1QU, United Kingdom.
Jesus Perdomo LampignanoNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, United Kingdom.
Matt ClarkRadiology.Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Bob WhellerRadiology.Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3106-1722
Jack BaldwinRadiology.Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
James CairnsRadiology.Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Simran DhesiRadiology.Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Mark HallNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, United Kingdom.
David J LoweHealth Tech Innovation and Translation Lab, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4866-2049
Haris ShuaibNewton's Tree, London, W1B 1NT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-5960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate feasibility of a federated AI monitoring service (FAMOS) for post-deployment surveillance of third-party AI applications used in chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation. Methods: FAMOS was deployed at 2 NHS Trusts using a federated architecture enabling local data processing while maintaining data governance compliance. De-identified CXRs from patients aged >18 years were retrospectively identified, along with relevant patient attributes (age, sex, inpatient status, image orientation, season, artefact). Chest X-rays were processed by 2 AI applications to simulate real-world deployment. FAMOS analyzed input data, AI inference values, and longitudinal human-AI agreement as proxy indicators of data, prediction, and behavioral drift. Input monitoring used image feature embeddings analyzed with principal component analysis and Hotelling's Results: Input monitoring identified a small proportion of outlier examinations, predominantly associated with modifiable image quality issues. Artificial intelligence inference values remained stable across most findings for both vendors, with limited drift events detected. Human-AI agreement patterns differed between sites, remaining stable at 1 site while increasing over time at another, suggesting evolving automation bias. Conclusions: Real-time, federated monitoring of deployed radiology AI systems is technically and operationally feasible within clinical environments. Multi-domain platform-based monitoring provides scalable, independent oversight and may function as an early-warning system supporting identification of emerging risks following deployment. Advances in knowledge: This study introduces a federated, multi-domain monitoring framework integrating sociotechnical indicators for continuous post-deployment surveillance of clinical radiology AI tools.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautomation biasclinical governancefederated monitoringpost-deployment monitoringradiology AI

Identifiers

PMID42818595
PMCPMC13623527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.