Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818553›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Evaluating the predictive power of pump-probe imaging contrast of melanin for metastatic outcome: A 71-patient study.

David Grass, Emma Bao, Martin C Fischer, M Angelica Selim, Georgia M Beasley, Warren S Warren

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David GrassDuke University, Department of Chemistry, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Emma BaoDuke University, Department of Physics, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Martin C FischerDuke University, Department of Chemistry, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
M Angelica SelimDuke University, Department of Pathology, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Georgia M BeasleyDuke University, Department of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Warren S WarrenDuke University, Department of Chemistry, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Improving Accuracy of Next-Generation Microscopy for Early Stage Metastatic Melanoma DetectionR21CA280272 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WARREN, WARREN S · 2024 to 2025
$406k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA280272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Most melanoma deaths arise from metastatic spread, yet current staging imperfectly identifies which primary tumors will progress. Melanin structure is altered during malignant transformation, and pump-probe microscopy (PPM) measures melanin excited-state dynamics in standard biopsy sections, offering molecular contrast that is complementary to morphology-based assessment. Aim: To determine whether PPM-derived melanin excited-state dynamics in primary cutaneous melanoma can predict metastatic outcome. Approach: We imaged unstained sections from 71 primary cutaneous melanomas and 18 melanoma metastases. Transient absorption curves were fit to a biexponential excited-state model, and the fit parameters were used as features for learning classifiers to predict metastatic outcome. Results: Melanin dynamics separated primary from metastatic tissue: both excited-state lifetimes were shorter in primaries, with common-language effect sizes up to 0.26. The same parameters did not separate primary tumors by outcome (effect sizes 0.41-0.61), and univariate logistic regression found no significant association for either the excited-state lifetimes or the ESA/GSB ratio. The best classifier reached 74% patient-level accuracy (AUC 0.73), a plateau reached by several unrelated architectures. Conclusions: PPM robustly distinguishes primary from metastatic melanoma tissue, consistent with progressive melanin disaggregation. While it is clear that pump-probe features of melanin thus correlate with tissue differences, melanin dynamics in single sections of the primary tumor, confounded by heterogeneity, do not give robust predictions of metastatic outcome.

Identifiers

PMID42818553
PMCPMC13622873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.