Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818549›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Automated Volumetric Segmentation of Microaneurysms on OCT Using Artificial Intelligence.

Min Gao, Yukun Guo, Tristan T Hormel, Jinyi Hao, Azaz Khan, Steven T Bailey, Thomas S Hwang, Yali Jia

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Min GaoCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Yukun GuoCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Tristan T HormelCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Jinyi HaoCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Azaz KhanCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Steven T BaileyCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Thomas S HwangCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Yali JiaCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a deep learning-based method for the automated identification and volumetric segmentation of microaneurysms (MAs) in diabetic retinopathy (DR) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Design: Cross-sectional study with a representative longitudinal case analysis. Participants: A total of 125 participants were enrolled, including 20 healthy eyes, 27 with mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR), 30 with moderate NPDR, 30 with severe NPDR, and 18 with proliferative DR. Methods: We obtained multiple repeated 3×3-mm scans from each participant using a commercial 120-kHz spectral-domain OCT system (Solix; Visionix/Optovue, Inc., California, USA) which were registered and averaged to generate high-definition volumes. We developed an end-to-end three-dimensional convolutional neural network, incorporating an encoder-decoder architecture with residual blocks, to segment MAs volumetrically. The input to the network consists of the original OCT volume concatenated with its reflectance-inverted counterpart to enhance feature extraction. Expert graders manually delineated MAs to generate initial annotations, which were later refined into a verified ground truth through an iterative human-in-the-loop refinement process to capture MAs initially overlooked or mischaracterized. Both single-scan volumes and volumes averaged across 4-10 repeated OCT volumes were used to train and test the model. We evaluated model performance at multiple levels, including voxel-level segmentation, lesion-level detection, and eye-level diagnosis. We also analyzed the differences in MA counts across various stages of DR severity and quantified the MA number and volume distribution in different retinal layers. A longitudinal analysis of MA dynamics was performed in a case with severe NPDR and macular edema using the algorithm. Main Outcome Measures: Voxel-level MA segmentation accuracy, MA quantification categorized by retinopathy severity, and longitudinal analysis of MA dynamics in OCT volumes. Results: In the test dataset (20 healthy, 20 DR eyes), when evaluated against the verified ground truth, the algorithm demonstrated high voxel-level accuracy, with F1 scores of 79.2% on single volumes and 86.1% on averaged volumes. Lesion-level detection reached an F1 score of 96.0% (single) and 97.1% (averaged), while scan-level diagnostic accuracy for MA presence was 97.5% (single and averaged). MA counts significantly increased from mild to moderate NPDR (7.4±1.5 vs. 12.7±1.6, P = 0.014) but not between any other severity comparisons (P>0.05). MAs were primarily localized to the inner nuclear layer and outer plexiform layer. In one case with severe NPDR and macular edema, longitudinal analysis tracked 11 resolved MAs and 3 new MAs post-treatment, corresponding to a reduction in fluid volume. Conclusions: A deep learning-based method can accurately identify and segment MAs volumetrically on OCT, enabling quantification and characterization and potentially aiding in the diagnosis, monitoring, and management of DR.

Identifiers

PMID42818549
PMCPMC13622869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.