ArticleArXiv2026
Emergence of criticality in models of real neurons.
Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Critical systems sit near boundaries between qualitatively distinct behaviors. When inferring models of neural activity, this proximity to criticality is thought to require the precise tuning of parameters. Here, we show that as the number of neurons increases, criticality can emerge naturally without fine-tuning. When computing observable statistics from parameters (the forward problem), some small regions in parameter space map to large regions in statistics space. These special parameters are precisely those near criticality. Thus, when inferring parameters from experimental measurements (the inverse problem), models concentrate near critical points, and this concentration becomes stronger as the system grows. We illustrate this flow toward criticality across many large-scale recordings in the mouse brain. In the Curie-Weiss model of Ising spins, we find that all of the recordings collapse to a first-order phase transition, despite substantial differences in the underlying systems. Together, these results suggest a resolution to the tension between criticality and fine-tuning in models of neural activity.
Identifiers
42818541PMC13622868What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.